Re: find first and last

[Bill Denney]

On Tue, 26 Sep 2006, John W. Eaton wrote:

> Running under gdb can also be helpful.  I think you are forgetting
> that arrays in C++ use 0-based indexing, even with liboctave objects.
> So if nargin > 1, you can safely access args(0) and args(1), but there
> is no guarantee about args(2).

That was it.  Thanks.  I work on m files too much to remember that.  Here 
is a version that is more efficient, and it should actually be more 
efficient for any matrix because it will only search the required range.

So, now for find(1:50 > 48) instead of going through 1:50 twice, it will 
only go through 1:50 once and the second time it will only look at 49 and 
50.

Hopefully this doesn't introduce any new bugs.

Bill

--
"If you're so special, why aren't you dead?"  -- The Breeders

find.diff
Description: Text document