[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: moving toward a 3.0 release

From: Bill Denney
Subject: Re: moving toward a 3.0 release
Date: Fri, 29 Sep 2006 09:03:59 -0400
User-agent: Thunderbird (Windows/20060909)

John W. Eaton wrote:
As much as I would like to have graphics functions that are more
compatible with Matlab, I don't think we can do it for 3.0, at least
not if we want th release to happen in the near future.
I agree with this, and I think that for the graphics features to be relatively well tested, that would take a somewhat long time on its own. I agree that (as you say later) this is a 3.1 feature.
If people do want to have a stable release by the end of the year,
then I think we need to go with more or less what we have.  I think
the new graphics features would be too risky to add at this point.  I
think it would make more sense to have a release soon, then plan for
something like

  3.1  includes graphics objects, perhaps by mid 2007
  3.2  class objects, maybe by the end of 2007
To me, this sounds like an excellent timetable.


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]