|
From: | Bill Denney |
Subject: | Re: moving toward a 3.0 release |
Date: | Fri, 29 Sep 2006 09:03:59 -0400 |
User-agent: | Thunderbird 1.5.0.7 (Windows/20060909) |
John W. Eaton wrote:
I agree with this, and I think that for the graphics features to be relatively well tested, that would take a somewhat long time on its own. I agree that (as you say later) this is a 3.1 feature.As much as I would like to have graphics functions that are more compatible with Matlab, I don't think we can do it for 3.0, at least not if we want th release to happen in the near future.
If people do want to have a stable release by the end of the year, then I think we need to go with more or less what we have. I think the new graphics features would be too risky to add at this point. I think it would make more sense to have a release soon, then plan for something like 3.1 includes graphics objects, perhaps by mid 2007 3.2 class objects, maybe by the end of 2007
To me, this sounds like an excellent timetable. Bill
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |