[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Autoloading of toolboxes?
From: |
David Bateman |
Subject: |
Re: Autoloading of toolboxes? |
Date: |
Mon, 29 Jan 2007 17:05:19 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Thunderbird 1.5.0.7 (X11/20060921) |
John W. Eaton wrote:
> I don't think it is a good idea to load all packages by default. That
> Octave Forge was typically packaged and distributed this way is
> something that I've never really liked, and was the reason I wanted to
> have a package system that would make it easy to install add-ons in
> smaller chunks.
>
> jwe
>
>
However, its not the behavior someone coming from the matlab world will
expect and we will be punished for the current behavior... The
distinction between manually and autoloaded packages is a compromise
that attempts to address this. I'd suggest that only the packages in
main/ by autoloaded.
Regards
David
--
David Bateman address@hidden
Motorola Labs - Paris +33 1 69 35 48 04 (Ph)
Parc Les Algorithmes, Commune de St Aubin +33 6 72 01 06 33 (Mob)
91193 Gif-Sur-Yvette FRANCE +33 1 69 35 77 01 (Fax)
The information contained in this communication has been classified as:
[x] General Business Information
[ ] Motorola Internal Use Only
[ ] Motorola Confidential Proprietary
- Autoloading of toolboxes?, David Bateman, 2007/01/29
- Re: Autoloading of toolboxes?, Michael Creel, 2007/01/29
- Re: Autoloading of toolboxes?, Søren Hauberg, 2007/01/29
- Re: Autoloading of toolboxes?, David Bateman, 2007/01/29
- Re: Autoloading of toolboxes?, Bill Denney, 2007/01/29
- Re: Autoloading of toolboxes?, David Bateman, 2007/01/30
- Re: Autoloading of toolboxes?, David Bateman, 2007/01/30
Autoloading of toolboxes?, John W. Eaton, 2007/01/29