2.9.11?

octave-maintainers

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

2.9.11?

From:	John W. Eaton
Subject:	2.9.11?
Date:	Wed, 18 Apr 2007 17:31:15 -0400

There have been a few bug fixes and improvements since 2.9.10 but I
haven't seen reports of any major problems.  So is there anything
pending that should hold up 2.9.11?  Should we label 2.9.11 the
"testing" version and relabel 2.1.73 "stable"?

jwe

[Prev in Thread]

Current Thread

[Next in Thread]

2.9.11?, John W. Eaton <=
- Re: 2.9.11?, David Bateman, 2007/04/18
  - Re: 2.9.11?, Thomas Weber, 2007/04/19
    - Re: 2.9.11?, Rafael Laboissiere, 2007/04/19
    - Re: 2.9.11?, David Bateman, 2007/04/19
    - Re: 2.9.11?, Rafael Laboissiere, 2007/04/19
    - Re: 2.9.11?, John W. Eaton, 2007/04/19
    - Re: 2.9.11?, Quentin Spencer, 2007/04/19
    - Re: 2.9.11?, Rafael Laboissiere, 2007/04/19
  - Re: 2.9.11?, Michael Goffioul, 2007/04/19
    - Re: 2.9.11?, Thomas Weber, 2007/04/19

Prev by Date: Re: AW: Re: Rewritten version of bar.m
Next by Date: Re: 2.9.11?
Previous by thread: Defining a latex environment in texinfo
Next by thread: Re: 2.9.11?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread