[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: polyint vs polyinteg
From: |
David Bateman |
Subject: |
Re: polyint vs polyinteg |
Date: |
Sat, 01 Sep 2007 00:52:44 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Thunderbird 1.5.0.7 (X11/20060921) |
John W. Eaton wrote:
> On 31-Aug-2007, David Bateman wrote:
>
> | John W. Eaton wrote:
> | > On 31-Aug-2007, Sylvain Pelissier wrote:
> | >
> | > | I have already done a polyint function in Octave forge. You could use it
> | > | if it could help and tell me when I could delete it in Octave forge.
> | >
> | > It looks like your polyint function is just a wrapper around
> | > polyinteg. We need it to be the other way around: polyint should be
> | > the real function and polyinteg (which will be deprecated and removed
> | > in the future) should call polyint to do the real work (assuming that
> | > it is possible to do that while retaining the existing interface for
> | > polyinteg, for backward compatibility).
> | >
> | > jwe
> | >
> |
> | Then what about the attached..
>
> OK, please check it in.
>
> Thanks,
>
> jwe
>
Done and removed from sourceforge...
D.