[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: type of sort(sparse(...))
|
From: |
John W. Eaton |
|
Subject: |
Re: type of sort(sparse(...)) |
|
Date: |
Tue, 04 Sep 2007 13:55:12 -0400 |
On 3-Sep-2007, David Bateman wrote:
| Ok, then that is an ugly mess and yes indexed sparse sort is not a good
| idea for memory reasons as the index matrix occupies so much space.
| Taking advantage of the sparsity does however speed up the sort even for
| indexed cases. See the attached patch.
Please check in these changes.
Thanks,
jwe