[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Do we really need to replace gnuplot?
From: |
Shai Ayal |
Subject: |
Re: Do we really need to replace gnuplot? |
Date: |
Mon, 15 Oct 2007 20:57:23 +0200 |
On 10/15/07, John W. Eaton <address@hidden> wrote:
> On 15-Oct-2007, Shai Ayal wrote:
>
> | But are you willing to sacrifce offscreen rendering for them?
>
> Precisely what do you mean by offscreen rendering?
I mean the ability to produce a plot in a file (e.g ps or png) w/o the
need for opening a window or indeed using any graphical capabilities
in the computer. gnuplot does this easily, However OpenGL is meant for
screen rendering, so even if you wish to produce a png file, you must
first render the scene to the screen and then convert it to a png
file.
There might be a solution for this using OpenGL pbuffers. I'm looking into it ..
Shai
- Do we really need to replace gnuplot?, Shai Ayal, 2007/10/15
- Re: Do we really need to replace gnuplot?, David Bateman, 2007/10/15
- Do we really need to replace gnuplot?, John W. Eaton, 2007/10/15
- Re: Do we really need to replace gnuplot?, Shai Ayal, 2007/10/15
- Re: Do we really need to replace gnuplot?, John W. Eaton, 2007/10/15
- Re: Do we really need to replace gnuplot?,
Shai Ayal <=
- Re: Do we really need to replace gnuplot?, Alexander Barth, 2007/10/15
- Re: Do we really need to replace gnuplot?, Shai Ayal, 2007/10/16
- Re: Do we really need to replace gnuplot?, kahacjde, 2007/10/17
- Re: Do we really need to replace gnuplot?, Shai Ayal, 2007/10/17
- Re: Do we really need to replace gnuplot?, Berk Geveci, 2007/10/15
- Re: Do we really need to replace gnuplot?, Shai Ayal, 2007/10/16