[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: 2.9.19??
From: |
John W. Eaton |
Subject: |
Re: 2.9.19?? |
Date: |
Mon, 10 Dec 2007 15:14:34 -0500 |
On 10-Dec-2007, Michael Goffioul wrote:
| On 12/10/07, John W. Eaton <address@hidden> wrote:
| > On 9-Dec-2007, David Bateman wrote:
| >
| > | I'm in the process of trying to create a release of octave-forge for
| > | 2.9.18. However, with the documentation text image build issue and the
| > | plot axis miscalculation it seems that 2.9.18 has a couple of really bad
| > | issues. So I wonder if a rapid 2.9.19 release before I finalize an
| > | octave-forge release wouldn't be a good idea?
| >
| > I'll try to make a new snapshot by Monday afternoon (US Eastern time).
|
| Could you then consider the following patch? This relates to the following
| thread:
|
| http://www.nabble.com/Problem-with-__plt_get_axis_arg__.m-to14106356.html
|
| I'd like to propose the same for the patch function, but I'm still waiting
| for a feddback from David (or anybody else concerned) about the clim
| explicit setting.
| 2007-12-10 Michael Goffioul <address@hidden>
|
| * plot/__line__.m plot/surface.m: call __go_xxx__ functions with all
| initial property/value pairs instead of using the "set" function
I checked in this change.
Thanks,
jwe
- 2.9.19??, David Bateman, 2007/12/09
- Re: 2.9.19??, Ben Abbott, 2007/12/09
- 2.9.19??, John W. Eaton, 2007/12/10
- Re: 2.9.19??, Tatsuro MATSUOKA, 2007/12/10
- Re: 2.9.19??, Michael Goffioul, 2007/12/10
- Re: 2.9.19??, David Bateman, 2007/12/10
- Re: 2.9.19??,
John W. Eaton <=
- Re: 2.9.19??, Tatsuro MATSUOKA, 2007/12/10
- Re: 2.9.19??, Tatsuro MATSUOKA, 2007/12/10
- Re: 2.9.19??, John W. Eaton, 2007/12/11
- Re: 2.9.19??, Michael Goffioul, 2007/12/11
- Re: 2.9.19??, Tatsuro MATSUOKA, 2007/12/11
- Re: 2.9.19??, Michael Goffioul, 2007/12/11
- Re: 2.9.19??, Tatsuro MATSUOKA, 2007/12/11
- Re: 2.9.19??, Tatsuro MATSUOKA, 2007/12/10
2.9.19??, John W. Eaton, 2007/12/11