[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: 3.0 when?
From: |
John W. Eaton |
Subject: |
Re: 3.0 when? |
Date: |
Wed, 19 Dec 2007 15:23:08 -0500 |
On 18-Dec-2007, Benjamin Lindner wrote:
| I would vote for moving edit.m from the forge package to octave core
| functions.
| Argument is similar to the imread/imwrite topic. Why should I first
| install a package to be able to conveniently invoke an editor.
OK, I added edit.m to Octave because it is a single .m file, so moving
it is easy.
I don't plan to move imread/imwrite to Octave until after 3.0 because
they are more complex and involve library dependencies.
jwe
- Re: 3.0 when?, (continued)
- Re: 3.0 when?, Benjamin Lindner, 2007/12/18
- Re: 3.0 when?, Tatsuro MATSUOKA, 2007/12/18
- Re: 3.0 when?, Michael Goffioul, 2007/12/18
- Re: 3.0 when?, John W. Eaton, 2007/12/18
- Re: 3.0 when?, Tatsuro MATSUOKA, 2007/12/18
- Re: 3.0 when?, Tatsuro MATSUOKA, 2007/12/19
- Re: 3.0 when?, John W. Eaton, 2007/12/19
- Re: 3.0 when?, Tatsuro MATSUOKA, 2007/12/19
- Re: 3.0 when?, David Bateman, 2007/12/19
- Re: 3.0 when?, Tatsuro MATSUOKA, 2007/12/19
Re: 3.0 when?,
John W. Eaton <=