Re: 3.0.1 release?

[Thomas Treichl]

John W. Eaton schrieb:
> On 12-Feb-2008, John Swensen wrote:
>
> | OK...I thought that (3.0.1 == mercurial head).
>
> No, there is a branch named release-3-0-x (in the CVS archive it was
> called release-3-0-0-branch).  We've only checked bug fixes in to this
> branch.  No major disruptive changes.

I have checked out the release-3-0-x branch. It took me some minutes to find out 
how this can be done with mercurial, that's why I will post the commands that I 
have used here, also for others that might be interested:

  hg branches
    # displays the available branches
  hg branch -f release-3-0-x
    # change to the release-3-0-x branch
  hg update -C
    # update and overwrite locally modified files

FYI, the current release-3-0-x snapshot can be build fine on Mac.

  Thomas