Re: [RFC] octave-to-backend notification of property change

[Michael Goffioul]

On Sun, Jul 6, 2008 at 11:57 AM, Maciek Gajewski
<address@hidden> wrote:
> But I can't understand why backend developers (*ehem* me *ehem*) have to be
> forced to use this scheme.

That's a weird statement: "octave's design does not fit well with my code
and I don't see why I should be forced to use octave's design"...

> Just three methods would do the magic:
> - property_changed( handle, name )
> - object_added( handle )
> - object_removed( handle )

Come with an appropriate changeset and we'll discuss it further.

Michael.