Re: patches for 3.0.x

[Jaroslav Hajek]

On Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 12:43 PM, David Bateman
<address@hidden> wrote:
> Jaroslav Hajek wrote:
>>
>> hello everybody,
>>
>> as you may have noticed, there are only 4 patches applied to 3.0.x
>> series in the last 5 weeks. I had little time recently, because we
>> have been blessed with a baby (or is "by a baby" the correct
>> English?).
>> I think most patches of the last couple of weeks are not intended for
>> 3.0.x branch (graphics etc), but it's almost certain that I have
>> missed some patches that are. Please, if you think a particular patch
>> should be applied to 3.0.x (bug & doc fixes), please point me to it so
>> that 3.0.x can catch up again.
>>
>> thanks
>>
>>
>
> I'd say the patches 8307, 8310, 8318, and 8325 to 8330 at least should be
> added.. Though perhaps 8325 to 8330 might be left as it only a question of
> speed..
>

I applied 8307, 8310, 8318, 8325:8328.
8329, 8330 omitted (they only improve performance, but break interface).
8307 breaks one interface as well but the bug is bad enough to justify
this, IMHO.

thanks a lot,



-- 
RNDr. Jaroslav Hajek
computing expert
Aeronautical Research and Test Institute (VZLU)
Prague, Czech Republic
url: www.highegg.matfyz.cz