Re: arrayfun.m reworked

[David Bateman]

Thomas Treichl wrote:
> David Bateman schrieb:
> > Thomas Treichl wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > I have finished reworking arrayfun - finally I decided to find the 
> > > bug in arrayfun.m and not to send my arrayun.cc here. And thanks to 
> > > David for having a look at the cellfun problems I have had ;)
> >
> > It appears that this changeset slipped through the cracks. Sorry, 
> > even though I made some bug fixes around this I fell back on the 
> > position that John would approve or not this patch.
>
> That is no problem. Thanks for applying it...
>
> > > PS. I have created a similiar large testset for cellfun, should I 
> > > prepare a patch for this or is this some kind of overshooting?
> > No full coverage testing is a good goal to aim for. If you have tests 
> > for cellfun, I'd say to send them.
>
> A changeset for review is attached.
>
> Regards,
>
>   Thomas
Works fine so I also pushed this to Savannah

Thanks
D.

--
David Bateman                                address@hidden
35 rue Gambetta                              +33 1 46 04 02 18 (Home)
92100 Boulogne-Billancourt FRANCE            +33 6 72 01 06 33 (Mob)