octave-maintainers
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Graphics and memory opinions


From: Daniel J Sebald
Subject: Graphics and memory opinions
Date: Fri, 05 Dec 2008 00:19:43 -0600
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.7.3) Gecko/20041020

Hi Folks,

I recall from time to time comments about the non-beauty of gnuplot plots, but 
in my opinion comparing them against other plotting software in common use on 
Windows machines I find them clean and simple.  The colored backgrounds of 
other plotting programs get kind of old after a while.  Also, gnuplot X11 makes 
good use of a window by keep margins thin by default.  Some other programs 
leave all kinds of space in the margins.  In any case, Octave graphics is 
pretty nice right now.

The one area where Octave seems a bit limiting is working with large data.  
Octave seems to require so much memory in order to load memory.  (Well, should 
assume it's Octave, could be Linux that has memory issues.)  From my rough 
guess, Octave requires free space of about 6-9 times the size of the file being 
loaded, at least for ASCII files.  For example, using 'load' on a 100 MB file 
will push Linux to the edge of 1 GB memory and the system will slow to a crawl.

What seems to happen is that a lot of memory is used to load data, then after 
the data is loaded the memory will drop down to something that reflects what 
one might guess.  John, what are your feelings on memory usage by Octave?  
Could it be more efficient?  Is Linux not as efficient as it could be?

Dan


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]