[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: deprecated functions
From: |
Jaroslav Hajek |
Subject: |
Re: deprecated functions |
Date: |
Mon, 2 Mar 2009 07:20:55 +0100 |
On Mon, Mar 2, 2009 at 1:23 AM, Jason Riedy <address@hidden> wrote:
> And Jaroslav Hajek writes:
>> If anyone thinks keeping dmult is a good idea, I can bring it back
>> reimplemented as a wrapper for the above expression.
>
> Oh, no. It just would have saved me some time knowing it had been
> reverted.
Do you mean you relied on the extended version already in your code?
> There might be others, so it might be worth noting in the
> deprecation notice.
>
> Jason
>
I'm not sure. I think that these descriptions of changes (aka the NEWS
file) usually relate to stable releases. We implicitly assume that
users of development sources can cope with changes on their own.
cheers
--
RNDr. Jaroslav Hajek
computing expert
Aeronautical Research and Test Institute (VZLU)
Prague, Czech Republic
url: www.highegg.matfyz.cz
- Re: deprecated functions, Jason Riedy, 2009/03/01
- Re: deprecated functions, Jaroslav Hajek, 2009/03/01
- Re: deprecated functions, Jason Riedy, 2009/03/01
- Re: deprecated functions,
Jaroslav Hajek <=
- Re: deprecated functions, Jason Riedy, 2009/03/04
- Re: deprecated functions, John W. Eaton, 2009/03/04
- Re: deprecated functions, Jason Riedy, 2009/03/04
- Re: deprecated functions, John W. Eaton, 2009/03/04
- Diagonal v. sparse matrices [was Re: deprecated functions], Jason Riedy, 2009/03/04
- Diagonal v. sparse matrices [was Re: deprecated functions], John W. Eaton, 2009/03/04
- Re: Diagonal v. sparse matrices [was Re: deprecated functions], Jaroslav Hajek, 2009/03/04
- Re: Diagonal v. sparse matrices [was Re: deprecated functions], John W. Eaton, 2009/03/04
- Re: Diagonal v. sparse matrices [was Re: deprecated functions], Jaroslav Hajek, 2009/03/04
- Re: Diagonal v. sparse matrices [was Re: deprecated functions], John W. Eaton, 2009/03/04