octave-maintainers
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: about contibuting to octave


From: Shai Ayal
Subject: Re: about contibuting to octave
Date: Wed, 11 Mar 2009 11:00:28 +0200

On Wed, Mar 11, 2009 at 10:39 AM, Søren Hauberg <address@hidden> wrote:
> ons, 11 03 2009 kl. 10:25 +0200, skrev Shai Ayal:
>> 2. A higher level BB calculator will be needed for TeX formatted
>> string which might have several fots, super & subscripts
>
> I'm not in anyway involved with the FLTK stuff, but it seems to me that
> one of the main problems with this backend is the lack of text. Wouldn't
> it be better to get something simple up and running fast? It could
> always be changed to support simple TeX stuff.
>

It's OK by me, but then we should keep in mind that this is indeed
simple, and not put too much effort into it, or do it with the TeX
expansion on the back of our minds. i.e. we could define a parser
class and just do the default simple parser first.



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]