Re: [PATCH 0 of 4] Implement basic sparse op diag and diag op sparse support.

[Jaroslav Hajek]

On Thu, Mar 12, 2009 at 9:05 PM, Jaroslav Hajek <address@hidden> wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 12, 2009 at 6:14 PM, John W. Eaton <address@hidden> wrote:
>> On 12-Mar-2009, Jaroslav Hajek wrote:
>>
>> | I basically agree with these changes, because their logic is
>> | undeniable (that was a good film :-).  I would, however, like to see
>> | more people say "yes" before including them for 3.2.x.
>>
>> These changes only involve sparse x diag or sparse x perm matrix
>> operations, right?
>
> Yes. These operations will be Matlab-incompatible, but they are also
> unlikely to be used in realistic Matlab code, because they're
> inefficient (in Matlab).
>
>> If so, then I suppose it would be OK to include
>> them in 3.2.
>
> OK. I'll do it tomorrow.
>

Done.

-- 
RNDr. Jaroslav Hajek
computing expert & GNU Octave developer
Aeronautical Research and Test Institute (VZLU)
Prague, Czech Republic
url: www.highegg.matfyz.cz