Re: 3.0.5 ?

[Jaroslav Hajek]

On Tue, Apr 7, 2009 at 11:53 AM, Thomas Weber
<address@hidden> wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 07, 2009 at 11:02:37AM +0200, Jaroslav Hajek wrote:
>> Well the fix is available in the archive, so anyone can download it to
>> patch the sources. I have no problem with making a new release
>> containing just this single bugfix, though I myself have no need for
>> it. Should it be named 3.0.5, 3.0.4-1 or something like that? Or
>> should we just re-release 3.0.4?
>
> Please, never, ever re-release a tarball. This breaks all kind of
> automatic version checkers, checksum testers and so on.
>
> There's nothing wrong with a 3.0.5 tarball.
>
>        Thomas
>

OK. Anyone objects to 3.0.5?


-- 
RNDr. Jaroslav Hajek
computing expert & GNU Octave developer
Aeronautical Research and Test Institute (VZLU)
Prague, Czech Republic
url: www.highegg.matfyz.cz