octave-maintainers
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: proposed FAQ entries about licensing


From: David Bateman
Subject: Re: proposed FAQ entries about licensing
Date: Wed, 08 Apr 2009 14:03:50 +0200
User-agent: Mozilla-Thunderbird 2.0.0.17 (X11/20081018)

Jaroslav Hajek wrote:
If you want to take advantage of any GPL-covered software, including
Octave, you need to honor the GPL (of course this means legally comply
with its terms, but I also think that you shouldn't use it if you
disagree with it's spirit). GPL protects free software from being
"proprietarized" in the precise sense you (maybe) look for.
You can, of course, use any other free software license for your code,
that doesn't impose GPL's strict copyleft requirements, but then you
can't make your code dependent on Octave, for instance, by using the
C++ interface, or by distributing binaries linked against Octave.


In fact MEX binaries can theoretically be used with both Octave and Matlab. In practice they can't at the moment but that doesn't change the fact you can distribute MEX binaries for Octave under whatever license you want as long as you don't distribute them in such a way that Octave and the proprietary MEX files become a single product..

Regards
David



--
David Bateman                                address@hidden
35 rue Gambetta                              +33 1 46 04 02 18 (Home)
92100 Boulogne-Billancourt FRANCE            +33 6 72 01 06 33 (Mob)



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]