|
From: | Daniel J Sebald |
Subject: | Re: desired features for gp backend? |
Date: | Sun, 14 Jun 2009 21:52:18 -0500 |
User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.7.3) Gecko/20041020 |
Ben Abbott wrote:
On Jun 14, 2009, at 1:36 PM, Daniel J Sebald wrote:Robert T. Short wrote:As far as octave with gnuplot, I really liked the old gplot interface.I liked it too.Dan, Robert, Was it just the interface that you liked, or some specific functionality?
Being able to send commands to gnuplot before doing a plot in order to modify gnuplot in ways not possible with the plot commands. The concept doesn't work so well anymore because plot() modifies a lot of things that one might want to set. However, as gnuplot evolves to retain data, it seems one could do this POST plot(). For example, set(fig, 'postplot', 'set gnuplotfeature xyz; replot') plot(x, y) might have value. It isn't that important at the moment. As Bob said, graphics is now pretty feature rich, plus gnuplot doesn't have the retained data working perfectly yet. Dan
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |