octave-maintainers
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: release 3.2.1


From: Robert T. Short
Subject: Re: release 3.2.1
Date: Thu, 09 Jul 2009 14:14:16 -0700
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.8.1.22) Gecko/20090606 SeaMonkey/1.1.17

Is there to be no comment on this at all? Both Daniel and I have made the same comments for the same reasons and probably because we have both experienced problems like this before. It isn't that Jaroslav is doing a bad job, but rather that the process (or rather lack of process) is guaranteed to have significant problems.

Bob


I think to support the branching paradigm we need a better organized team, possibly more bug reporting / tracking tools, and some type of beta schedule. One has to resist the desire to get new features to market ASAP, and instead set versions aside so that the whole group can test-run the version over a month. Just let the developers site know there is a new release candidate for beta testing. Any bugs could then be entered into a bug tracker (which we don't have) for the particular version. Without that, one or two release versions, a developer version...and soon it is too much for any one person to keep track of. If it were a smaller project, perhaps, but not one this size.

Also, there are certain hunks of code that are "tricky programming" and should be modified only long before a release. unwind_protect is one of those. Stacks, recursions, interrupts, and such have a lot of paths and conditions that are easy to overlook.

Dan





reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]