Re: conv2 performance

[Michael D. Godfrey]

On 3/3/10 12:30 PM, John W. Eaton wrote:
> On  3-Mar-2010, Jaroslav Hajek wrote:
>
> | On Wed, Mar 3, 2010 at 7:28 PM, Michael D. Godfrey
> |<address@hidden>  wrote:
> |>  Jaroslav,
> |>
> |>  Here is what I got for 3 runs using the matlab shown
> |>  below, and following are 3 runs on the same machine
> |>  (Linux qss.stanford.edu 2.6.31.12-174.2.3.fc12.x86_64 #1 SMP Mon Jan 18
> |>  19:52:07 UTC 2010 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux)
> |>  using your latest patches as of today (3 March).
> |>
> |
> | Incl. this one, I suppose:
> |http://hg.savannah.gnu.org/hgweb/octave/rev/5af0b4bb384d
>    

Yes, this was included.

Michael

> Is there a particular reason to use Fortran for this with several
> essentially repeated functions instead of a C++ template?  I know the
> BLAS routines are unique functions, but couldn't they be handled as
> template parameters, similar to the way we handle the mapping
> functions in the Array<T>::map methods?
>
> jwe
>