[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Logos proposal
From: |
Ben Barrowes |
Subject: |
Re: Logos proposal |
Date: |
Wed, 30 Jun 2010 07:46:11 -0400 |
User-agent: |
KMail/1.11.4 (Linux/2.6.27.45-server-1mnb; KDE/4.2.4; i686; ; ) |
On Wednesday 30 June 2010 02:43:03 Fotios Kasolis wrote:
> >
> > I would really like to see the version you mention with a \infty cut out.
> > And with the underline like we had before (the B+W version).
> >
> > Both of the ways you mention to make an attribution to Eaton seem to me
> > to make things too busy, i.e. too many lines... at least when I try to
> > imagine what you describe. Maybe we could just leave it as a script "E"
> > in some font, maybe a little taller than the \forall and v. That would
> > stand it out a bit and we could drop in an "E" more like jwe's signature
> > "E" at any time.
>
> /Fotios
Great work! I think this looks good, and hopefully we are converging on sth the
community could
support. I personally would
1) narrow the oc just a bit (if possible) 10-15%, but I don't know how to do
this in latex
2) it looks like the bottom of the oc is cut off (flat lower edges)?
3) I liked the \nu looking v better than this capital V. The \nu also was a nod
to the gnu aspect of
octave
Is the octave part latex'able? If so, could you post that code?
- Re: Logos proposal, (continued)
- Re: Logos proposal, Ben Barrowes, 2010/06/17
- Re: Logos proposal, Fotios Kasolis, 2010/06/17
- Re: Logos proposal, Judd Storrs, 2010/06/18
- Re: Logos proposal, Judd Storrs, 2010/06/18
- Re: Logos proposal, Ben Barrowes, 2010/06/21
- Re: Logos proposal, Ben Barrowes, 2010/06/21
- Re: Logos proposal, Fotios Kasolis, 2010/06/10
Re: Logos proposal, Fotios Kasolis, 2010/06/25