[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Equalis Octave group
From: |
Jordi Gutiérrez Hermoso |
Subject: |
Re: Equalis Octave group |
Date: |
Mon, 11 Oct 2010 11:12:22 -0500 |
On 11 October 2010 10:55, Dave Barnes <address@hidden> wrote:
> Equalis is trying to be involved in and support open source software.
Btw, 'round these parts, we prefer the term "free software".
I'm still a little wary of Equalis. Timeo Danaos et dona ferentes. If
you could make it quite explicit in your terms of service that you
favour open source and software freedom, my qualms could dissolve.
- Re: Octave vs Scilab, (continued)
- Re: Octave vs Scilab, Tatsuro MATSUOKA, 2010/10/06
- Equalis Octave group, Dave Barnes, 2010/10/07
- Re: Equalis Octave group, Jordi Gutiérrez Hermoso, 2010/10/07
- Re: Equalis Octave group, Søren Hauberg, 2010/10/07
- Re: Equalis Octave group, Dave Barnes, 2010/10/08
- Re: Equalis Octave group, Judd Storrs, 2010/10/08
- Re: Equalis Octave group, Jordi Gutiérrez Hermoso, 2010/10/08
- Re: Equalis Octave group, Dave Barnes, 2010/10/10
- Re: Equalis Octave group, Judd Storrs, 2010/10/11
- Re: Equalis Octave group, Dave Barnes, 2010/10/11
- Re: Equalis Octave group,
Jordi Gutiérrez Hermoso <=
- Re: Equalis Octave group, Judd Storrs, 2010/10/11
- Re: Equalis Octave group, Dave Barnes, 2010/10/12
- Re: Equalis Octave group, Judd Storrs, 2010/10/12
- Re: Equalis Octave group, Dave Barnes, 2010/10/13
- Re: Equalis Octave group, Robert T. Short, 2010/10/08
- Re: Octave vs Scilab, Judd Storrs, 2010/10/07
Re: Octave vs Scilab, Jaroslav Hajek, 2010/10/07
Re: Octave vs Scilab, Carmine Napolitano, 2010/10/13