octave-maintainers
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: AspectRatio Patches [changeset]


From: logari81
Subject: Re: AspectRatio Patches [changeset]
Date: Thu, 28 Oct 2010 10:02:35 +0200

On Thu, 2010-10-28 at 15:47 +0800, Ben Abbott wrote:
> On Oct 28, 2010, at 3:31 PM, John W. Eaton wrote:
> 
> > On 28-Oct-2010, logari81 wrote:
> > 
> > | thank you for reviewing the patches. The changelog entry seems to be ok.
> > 
> > The entry is just
> > 
> > | +2010-10-28  Konstantinos Poulios <address@hidden>
> > | + * Fix the dataspectratio and plotboxaspectratio for the fltk
> > | + backend.
> > | +
> > 
> > but it should really say which functions changed, and what changed.
> > Something like:
> > 
> > 2010-10-28  Konstantinos Poulios  <address@hidden>
> > 
> >     * graphics.cc (updating_aspectratios): New file-scope variable.
> >     (axes::properties::update_aspectratios, axes::update_axis_limits):
> >     Return immediately if updating_aspecratios is true.
> >     (axes::properties::update_aspectratios):
> >     Some explanation of the other changes to this function
> >     (PLEASE ADD; I don't know what they are about).
> >     * graphics.h.in (class axes::properties): Tag dataaspectratio,
> >     dataaspectratiomode, plotboxaspectratio, and
> >     plotboxaspectratiomode with "u" qualifier.
> >     (axes::update_dataaspectratio,
> >     axes::update_dataaspectratiomode,
> >     axes::update_plotboxaspectratio,
> >     axes::update_plotboxaspectratiomode): New functions.
> 
> Thats my mistake. I can fix it.
> 
> Kostas, I'm not a c/c++ programmer, so I'll leave the rest to you. I'll wait 
> for the corrections before pushing a changeset.
> 
> Ben
> 

ok, I will prepare a new changeset taking into account the hints given
by Eaton.

Kostas



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]