Re: Comparing plots to Matlab

[Kai Habel]

 On 05.12.2010 12:12, Soren Hauberg wrote:
> son, 05 12 2010 kl. 18:39 +0100, skrev Kai Habel:
> > On 05.12.2010 10:56, Soren Hauberg wrote:
> > > fre, 03 12 2010 kl. 12:03 -0500, skrev John W. Eaton:
> > > > On  3-Dec-2010, Ben Abbott wrote:
> > > >
> > > > | By the end of the day, I'll have pushed fixes for each, except for the 
> > > > errorbar. The errorbar problem is due to a conflict between line and errorbar 
> > > > format conflicts.
> > > > |
> > > > | To allow for a more complete comparison, can a Matlab version of somebrero() 
> > > > be used? ... or should the demos be modified to use peaks()?
> > > >
> > > > How about modifying Soren's script to substitute peaks for sombrero
> > > > (maybe everywhere except the demo for sombrero itself)?
> > > I just made sombrero matlab compatible and added it to the path of the
> > > matlab instance I used to generate the plots. I've re-run the script
> > > which gave some more images. The source-forge page has been updated with
> > > these new images.
> > >
> > > Soren
> > Soeren,
> >
> > thanks for your efforts. If you have time, can you add on top the page
> > the versions of octave,gnuplot, fltk, and matlab.
> I've added this information for the gnuplot plots and for matlab. JWE
> generated the FLTK plots so he'll have to provide the relevant data.
Thanks,
it is intresting that you see artefacts for some of the suface plots 
using matlab. My experience is that the matlab graphic under linux is 
worse compared to windows. I don't know who is blame here: Mathworks or 
the graphic  driver, or maybe both.
> > Since I have only a 1280x1024 display I cannot see all 3 graphs at the
> > same time. Maybe we could reduce the image size a bit.
> I'm using a similar sized display, so I know what you mean. I, however,
> found that if I made the plots much smaller the browser resizing
> (Firefox) made the plots hard to look at (lines start disappearing etc).

Thats what I have feared, in that case we have to live with it.

Kai