Re: compilation warnings in liboctave/CMatrix.cc

[CdeMills]

Jordi Gutiérrez Hermoso wrote:
> 
> On 13 January 2011 04:40, CdeMills <address@hidden> wrote:
>> Is it really worth a function ? Couldn't it be reduced to an inline func
>> or
>> some #define ?
> 
> Please try to keep #defines at an absolute mininum. We've already run
> into problems with rampant #defines causing obscure compiler errors in
> X headers. By itself, inlining a function should not be a reason to
> use #define; gcc is already very good at deciding which functions
> should be inlined, even if you don't use the inline keyword.
> 
> - Jordi G. H.
> 
> 

Here you are

Pascal

http://octave.1599824.n4.nabble.com/file/n3216004/get_blas_trans_arg.pat
get_blas_trans_arg.pat 
-- 
View this message in context: 
http://octave.1599824.n4.nabble.com/compilation-warnings-in-liboctave-CMatrix-cc-tp3215607p3216004.html
Sent from the Octave - Maintainers mailing list archive at Nabble.com.