[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: 2 problems with 3.3.92
From: |
marco atzeri |
Subject: |
Re: 2 problems with 3.3.92 |
Date: |
Tue, 8 Feb 2011 06:56:48 +0100 |
On Tue, Feb 8, 2011 at 2:52 AM, Rik wrote:
> marco atzeri wrote:
>> On Mon, Feb 7, 2011 at 6:58 PM, Rik wrote:
>>> If this checks out then there may be an issue with your version of GNU Make
>>> and VPATH builds. For example, when I try a test make of AUTHORS in my
>>> build directory I get
>>> ----------------------------------------------------------
>>> rik:~/downloads/build: make -n AUTHORS
>>> make -C doc/interpreter ../../AUTHORS
>>> make[1]: Entering directory `/home/rik/downloads/build/doc/interpreter'
>>> make[1]: `../../../octave-3.3.92/doc/interpreter/../../AUTHORS' is up to
>>> date.
>>> make[1]: Leaving directory `/home/rik/downloads/build/doc/interpreter'
>>> ----------------------------------------------------------
>>>
> Is this after a successful build with AUTHORS in the build directory? The
> first invocation you quoted showed that AUTHORS needed to be rebuilt, and
> that was causing the problem. This invocation is showing that AUTHORS is
> up-to-date and no commands will be executed. It can't be both things.
Rik this is your system.
>
> Here is one test:
> tar xf octave-3.3.92.tar.gz
> mkdir build
> cd build
> ../octave-3.3.92/configure
> make AUTHORS
>
> There is no need to 'make' the rest of Octave to test this. On my system
> there is no AUTHORS file in the build directory and the make command
> reports that AUTHORS is up to date.
>
> If that works, you could try running the autoreconf step and see if this
> causes the documentation to require re-building.
>
> --Rik
Ok, I will try