octave-maintainers
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: SLATEC error: Chebyshev series too short for specified accuracy


From: Jarno Rajahalme
Subject: Re: SLATEC error: Chebyshev series too short for specified accuracy
Date: Tue, 1 Mar 2011 19:58:04 +0200

On Mar 1, 2011, at 18:12 , ext Camillo wrote:

> On 27/feb/2011, at 11.29, Jarno Rajahalme wrote:
> 
>> On Feb 25, 2011, at 3:30 , ext Ben Abbott wrote:
>> 
>>> On Feb 24, 2011, at 7:57 PM, Camillo wrote:
>>> 
>>>> Hello,
>>>> 
>>>> I am working on a Mac build of Octave 3.4.0. It's almost complete: it 
>>>> passes 6908 tests, has 2 known failures, and 5 unexpected ones. Four of 
>>>> these five are due to the same issue, an exception inside SLATEC: 
>>>> "Chebyshev series too short for specified accuracy". I don't know Fortran 
>>>> and I'm not sure how to best debug the issue. The compilers I am using are 
>>>> gcc and gfortran 4.2.1.
>>>> 
>>>> I first posted this question on the general mailing list, where Ben Abbot 
>>>> asked for more information, so here it is:
>>>> 
>>>>> Where did you get your gfortran?
>>>> 
>>>> http://r.research.att.com/gfortran-42-5664.pkg
>>>> 
>>>>> What dependencies did you install?
>>>> 
>>>> All, except for gnuplot and ghostscript.
>>>> 
>>>>> What was the result of running ./configure? (it gives a summary at the 
>>>>> end)
>>>>> 
>>>>> Finally, please copy-n-paste the actual error.
>>>> 
>>>> I'll attach the configure summary, and here are the insteresting parts of 
>>>> the output of "make check":
>>>> 
>>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>> src/DLD-FUNCTIONS/besselj.cc ........................... PASS  180/180 
>>>> src/DLD-FUNCTIONS/betainc.cc ........................... ***MESSAGE FROM 
>>>> ROUTINE INITS IN LIBRARY SLATEC.
>>>> ***POTENTIALLY RECOVERABLE ERROR, PROG ABORTED, TRACEBACK REQUESTED
>>>> *  Chebyshev series too short for specified accuracy
>>>> *  ERROR NUMBER = 1
>>>> *   
>>>> ***END OF MESSAGE
>>>> 
>>>> ***JOB ABORT DUE TO UNRECOVERED ERROR.
>>>> 0          ERROR MESSAGE SUMMARY
>>>> LIBRARY    SUBROUTINE MESSAGE START             NERR     LEVEL     COUNT
>>>> SLATEC     INITS      Chebyshev series too         1         1         1
>>>> 
>>>> ***MESSAGE FROM ROUTINE INITS IN LIBRARY SLATEC.
>>>> ***POTENTIALLY RECOVERABLE ERROR, PROG ABORTED, TRACEBACK REQUESTED
>>>> *  Chebyshev series too short for specified accuracy
>>>> *  ERROR NUMBER = 1
>>>> *   
>>>> ***END OF MESSAGE
>>>> 
>>>> ***JOB ABORT DUE TO UNRECOVERED ERROR.
>>>> 0          ERROR MESSAGE SUMMARY
>>>> LIBRARY    SUBROUTINE MESSAGE START             NERR     LEVEL     COUNT
>>>> SLATEC     INITS      Chebyshev series too         1         1         2
>>>> 
>>>> PASS    4/6    FAIL 2
>>>> 
>>>> ...
>>>> 
>>>> src/DLD-FUNCTIONS/gammainc.cc .......................... ***MESSAGE FROM 
>>>> ROUTINE INITS IN LIBRARY SLATEC.
>>>> ***POTENTIALLY RECOVERABLE ERROR, PROG ABORTED, TRACEBACK REQUESTED
>>>> *  Chebyshev series too short for specified accuracy
>>>> *  ERROR NUMBER = 1
>>>> *   
>>>> ***END OF MESSAGE
>>>> 
>>>> ***JOB ABORT DUE TO UNRECOVERED ERROR.
>>>> 0          ERROR MESSAGE SUMMARY
>>>> LIBRARY    SUBROUTINE MESSAGE START             NERR     LEVEL     COUNT
>>>> SLATEC     INITS      Chebyshev series too         1         1         3
>>>> 
>>>> ***MESSAGE FROM ROUTINE INITS IN LIBRARY SLATEC.
>>>> ***POTENTIALLY RECOVERABLE ERROR, PROG ABORTED, TRACEBACK REQUESTED
>>>> *  Chebyshev series too short for specified accuracy
>>>> *  ERROR NUMBER = 1
>>>> *   
>>>> ***END OF MESSAGE
>>>> 
>>>> ***JOB ABORT DUE TO UNRECOVERED ERROR.
>>>> 0          ERROR MESSAGE SUMMARY
>>>> LIBRARY    SUBROUTINE MESSAGE START             NERR     LEVEL     COUNT
>>>> SLATEC     INITS      Chebyshev series too         1         1         4
>>>> 
>>>> PASS    2/4    FAIL 2
>>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>> 
>>>> This is the information about the fifth error from fntests.log:
>>>> 
>>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>>>>> processing 
>>>>>>>>> /private/tmp/homebrew-octave-3.4.0-kEbx/octave-3.4.0/src/mappers.cc
>>>> ***** assert(arg (single(-1)), single(pi));
>>>> !!!!! test failed
>>>> assert (arg (single (-1)),single (pi)) expected
>>>> 3.1416
>>>> but got
>>>> 3.1416
>>>> values do not match
>>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>> 
>>>> I know about the problem with Apple's BLAS and gfortran, and I am using a 
>>>> small wrapper library for the affected routines (as suggested in 
>>>> <http://developer.apple.com/hardwaredrivers/ve/errata.html#fortran_conventions>);
>>>>  this is the "dotwrp" library you can see in the configure summary. I was 
>>>> told that a different wrapper has been proposed on this list, replacing 
>>>> some functions from LAPACK as well; I was wondering if anybody has a 
>>>> simple test case for some of those functions, so I could quickly check if 
>>>> the library I'm using is sufficient.
>>>> 
>>>> Best regards,
>>>> Camillo Lugaresi
>>>> 
>>>> <configure summary>
>>> 
>>> I am also using 4.2.1 and the gfortran from AT&T.
>>> 
>>> Iv'e compiled for 32bit and do not see the SLATEC problem.
>>> 
>>> Jarno / Richard, might this be related to the 64bit vecLib problem?
>>> 
>> 
>> I recall seeing similar error messages in the past. I recommend trying with 
>> the patch at http://savannah.gnu.org/patch/index.php?7468.
>> 
>> That patch provider gfortran native calling convention stubs for Apple BLAS 
>> and LAPACK calls. However, it does not otherwise replace any LAPACK 
>> routines. 
>> 
>> Jarno
> 
> I tried applying that patch. Rather than fighting with autotools (OS X comes 
> with an older version than needed), I edited the configuration manually, but 
> I think I got it to work. However, when I run "make check", I get this:
> 
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Integrated test scripts:
> 
>  src/DLD-FUNCTIONS/besselj.cc ........................... PASS  180/180 
>  src/DLD-FUNCTIONS/betainc.cc ........................... ***MESSAGE FROM 
> ROUTINE INITS IN LIBRARY SLATEC.
> ***POTENTIALLY RECOVERABLE ERROR, PROG ABORTED, TRACEBACK REQUESTED
> *  Chebyshev series too short for specified accuracy
> *  ERROR NUMBER = 1
> *   
> ***END OF MESSAGE
> 
> ***JOB ABORT DUE TO UNRECOVERED ERROR.
> 0          ERROR MESSAGE SUMMARY
> LIBRARY    SUBROUTINE MESSAGE START             NERR     LEVEL     COUNT
> SLATEC     INITS      Chebyshev series too         1         1         1
> 
> ***MESSAGE FROM ROUTINE INITS IN LIBRARY SLATEC.
> ***POTENTIALLY RECOVERABLE ERROR, PROG ABORTED, TRACEBACK REQUESTED
> *  Chebyshev series too short for specified accuracy
> *  ERROR NUMBER = 1
> *   
> ***END OF MESSAGE
> 
> ***JOB ABORT DUE TO UNRECOVERED ERROR.
> 0          ERROR MESSAGE SUMMARY
> LIBRARY    SUBROUTINE MESSAGE START             NERR     LEVEL     COUNT
> SLATEC     INITS      Chebyshev series too         1         1         2
> 
> PASS    4/6    FAIL 2
>  src/DLD-FUNCTIONS/bsxfun.cc ............................ PASS   72/72  
>  src/DLD-FUNCTIONS/cellfun.cc ........................... PASS   77/77  
>  src/DLD-FUNCTIONS/chol.cc .............................. PASS   26/26  
>  src/DLD-FUNCTIONS/conv2.cc ............................. PASS    4/4   
>  src/DLD-FUNCTIONS/convhulln.cc ......................... PASS    2/2   
>  src/DLD-FUNCTIONS/dassl.cc ............................. PASS    4/4   
>  src/DLD-FUNCTIONS/det.cc ............................... PASS    5/5   
>  src/DLD-FUNCTIONS/dlmread.cc ........................... PASS   20/20  
>  src/DLD-FUNCTIONS/dmperm.cc ............................ PASS    5/5   
>  src/DLD-FUNCTIONS/eig.cc ............................... PASS   20/20  
>  src/DLD-FUNCTIONS/eigs.cc ..............................panic: Segmentation 
> fault -- stopping myself...
> make[2]: *** [check] Segmentation fault
> make[1]: *** [check-recursive] Error 1
> make: *** [check] Error 2
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> What output do you get for "make check"?
> 

I get only one FAIL on mappers, which is known and due to how Apple implements 
atan2f.

Did you note that with the BLAS wrapper you should NOT use -ff2c for Octave nor 
any dependencies (all fortran libraries).

  Jarno




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]