[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Release 3.4.1
From: |
Rik |
Subject: |
Re: Release 3.4.1 |
Date: |
Mon, 04 Apr 2011 13:50:32 -0700 |
On 04/04/2011 07:14 AM, John W. Eaton wrote:
> Are there changes that break binary compatibility or any otherwise
> risky changes that have been applied to the default branch since the
> 3.4.0 release?
Is there a simple way to let Octave answer this question rather than having
to review all the changesets?
I'm only guessing at a process, but it would be something like this:
1) compile and install version 3.4.1
2) run octave-3.4.0
3) switch all library references over to the 3.4.1 libraries using path,
EXEC_PATH, and any other internal variables necessary.
4) run the full test suite and see if it passes.
--Rik
- Re: Bug tracker and transplants, Rik, 2011/04/01
- Re: Bug tracker and transplants, Jordi Gutiérrez Hermoso, 2011/04/01
- Re: Bug tracker and transplants, John W. Eaton, 2011/04/01
- Re: Release 3.4.1,
Rik <=
- Re: Release 3.4.1, Orion Poplawski, 2011/04/04
- Re: Release 3.4.1, John W. Eaton, 2011/04/06
- Re: Release 3.4.1, Rik, 2011/04/06
- Re: Release 3.4.1, John W. Eaton, 2011/04/07
- Re: stable and default branches, Rik, 2011/04/07
- Re: stable and default branches, John W. Eaton, 2011/04/08
- Re: Release 3.4.1, Orion Poplawski, 2011/04/06
- Re: Release 3.4.1, Jordi Gutiérrez Hermoso, 2011/04/07