Re: Successfully merged projects

[John W. Eaton]

On 11-Apr-2011, Michael D Godfrey wrote:

| I do not want to get into the "which editor is right" discussion.
| The only reasonable answer is the "the one you like and know."

I agree with you and I am also not trying to tell anyone which editor
is right for them.

But since which editor is right is the one you like and know, Octave
should not force a particular editor on anyone.  It can have a
default, and that can be a braindead stupid simple one that people
find easy to use.  But I don't see why we need to create a new one.
Aren't there enough out there already that could be adapted?  And it
should also be possible for us to use Emacs as the editor if that is
what we want.

jwe