[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: adapting changesets without starting over
From: |
Jordi Gutiérrez Hermoso |
Subject: |
Re: adapting changesets without starting over |
Date: |
Sun, 28 Aug 2011 10:39:06 -0500 |
2011/8/28 Carlo de Falco <address@hidden>:
>
> On 28 Aug 2011, at 00:48, c. wrote:
>
>>
>> On 28 Aug 2011, at 00:15, Jordi Gutiérrez Hermoso wrote:
>>
>>> you'll see that it says to use -D to update the date.
>>
>> OK, done.
>> If no-one objects to the contents of the patch, I'll push it tomorrow.
>> c.
>
> I think I'm ready to push, on which branch should it go? default or stable?
It's a new development, so it should go on default. Bugfixes and most
documentation patches should go on stable if they are not targeting an
earlier development on default.
- Jordi G. H.
- Re: adapting changesets without starting over, (continued)
- Re: adapting changesets without starting over, Ben Abbott, 2011/08/27
- Re: adapting changesets without starting over, Jordi Gutiérrez Hermoso, 2011/08/27
- Re: adapting changesets without starting over, c., 2011/08/27
- Re: adapting changesets without starting over, Jordi Gutiérrez Hermoso, 2011/08/27
- Re: adapting changesets without starting over, c., 2011/08/27
- Re: adapting changesets without starting over, Jordi Gutiérrez Hermoso, 2011/08/27
- Re: adapting changesets without starting over, c., 2011/08/27
- Re: adapting changesets without starting over, Jordi Gutiérrez Hermoso, 2011/08/27
- Re: adapting changesets without starting over, c., 2011/08/27
- Re: adapting changesets without starting over, Carlo de Falco, 2011/08/28
- Re: adapting changesets without starting over,
Jordi Gutiérrez Hermoso <=
- Re: adapting changesets without starting over, Ben Abbott, 2011/08/27
Re: adapting changesets without starting over, c., 2011/08/27