[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: tests in log-scale plots
From: |
c. |
Subject: |
Re: tests in log-scale plots |
Date: |
Tue, 6 Sep 2011 16:51:04 +0200 |
On 6 Sep 2011, at 16:42, John W. Eaton wrote:
> %!test
> %! figure (1, 'visible', 'off')
> %! clf ();
> %! plot (something);
>
> Sure, this tests that the plot function executes without error, but it
> doesn't tell us anything about whether the plot is correct.
In the patch I pushed I added checks on graphic handle properties like
ytick, yscale, xscale to see whether they are set as expected.
> Also, not that we should cover up bugs, but weren't there problems
> with using "figure (1, 'visible', 'off')" with the OpenGL+FLTK
> plotting? It seems to work for me now, but I remember a bug report
> about this and I don't remember it being fixed for everyone.
at the moment it seems to work for me on both OSX 10.6 and ubuntu.
> jwe
c.
- tests in log-scale plots, Carlo de Falco, 2011/09/06
- Re: tests in log-scale plots, Kai Habel, 2011/09/06
- Re: tests in log-scale plots, John W. Eaton, 2011/09/06
- Re: tests in log-scale plots,
c. <=
- Re: tests in log-scale plots, Kai Habel, 2011/09/06
- Re: tests in log-scale plots, Ben Abbott, 2011/09/06
- Re: tests in log-scale plots, Kai Habel, 2011/09/06
- Re: tests in log-scale plots, Ben Abbott, 2011/09/06
- Re: tests in log-scale plots, Kai Habel, 2011/09/06
- Re: tests in log-scale plots, Ben Abbott, 2011/09/06
- Re: tests in log-scale plots, Kai Habel, 2011/09/06
- Re: tests in log-scale plots, Ben Abbott, 2011/09/06
- Re: tests in log-scale plots, c., 2011/09/07
- Re: tests in log-scale plots, Kai Habel, 2011/09/07