[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Handling "parfor" as "for"
From: |
Jussi Lehtola |
Subject: |
Re: Handling "parfor" as "for" |
Date: |
Mon, 26 Sep 2011 10:14:12 +0300 |
On Sun, 25 Sep 2011 11:32:31 -0400
Ben Abbott <address@hidden> wrote:
> I think this is a question for the development community, so I'm
> moving it to the developers list.
>
> For those unfamiliar with "parfor" is a parallel for loop.
>
> http://www.mathworks.com/help/toolbox/distcomp/parfor.html
This would be an ideal case to take advantage of OpenMP parallelization.
--
Jussi Lehtola
Fedora Project Contributor
address@hidden
- Re: Handling "parfor" as "for", (continued)
- Re: Handling "parfor" as "for", Mark Everitt, 2011/09/28
- Re: Handling "parfor" as "for", Jordi Gutiérrez Hermoso, 2011/09/29
- Re: Handling "parfor" as "for", Mark Everitt, 2011/09/29
- Re: Handling "parfor" as "for", John W. Eaton, 2011/09/29
- Re: Handling "parfor" as "for", Mark Everitt, 2011/09/29
- Re: Handling "parfor" as "for", John W. Eaton, 2011/09/29
- Re: Handling "parfor" as "for", Søren Hauberg, 2011/09/29
- Re: Handling "parfor" as "for", John W. Eaton, 2011/09/29
- Re: Handling "parfor" as "for", John W. Eaton, 2011/09/29
- Re: Handling "parfor" as "for", Søren Hauberg, 2011/09/29
Re: Handling "parfor" as "for",
Jussi Lehtola <=