|
From: | Michael D Godfrey |
Subject: | Re: Is FLTK the default toolkit for 3.6.0? |
Date: | Wed, 30 Nov 2011 12:23:06 -0800 |
User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:8.0) Gecko/20111115 Thunderbird/8.0 |
On 11/30/2011 11:56 AM, Jordi Gutiérrez Hermoso wrote:
It is not possible to decide "objectively" whether fltk should be made the default. But, my own view, based on using fltk as the default by putting it in my .octaverc file is that it is preferable to gnuplot for my work. I use this flow for papers that I am currently publishing. Since it is the long term objective to make fltk the default (until something better can be done), the sooner the switch the better. When considering this, the most serious problem that, it appears, will not be resolved by 3.6 release is the handling of numeric values above single precision. This can be handled by rescaling, but it looks like a fairly serious amount of work. The release information should mention this restriction. So, I agree with Jordi: take the plunge!! Michael |
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |