Ordering of return values in C++ files

[Rik]

12/9/11

John,

I believe you mentioned at some point that the following construction

retval(1) = xxx;
retval(0) = yyy;

is preferable to

retval(0) = yyy;
retval(1) = xxx;

because octave_value_list will only be sized once.  Is my memory correct?

If this is true then there are 51 instances of the bad pattern which would
be trivial to fix.

Cheers,
Rik