octave-maintainers
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: fixes for gl2ps ?


From: Ben Abbott
Subject: Re: fixes for gl2ps ?
Date: Sat, 31 Dec 2011 13:43:53 -0500

On Dec 31, 2011, at 1:13 PM, Orion Poplawski wrote:

> On 12/31/2011 10:11 AM, Ben Abbott wrote:
> 
>> On Dec 15, 2011, at 3:24 PM, John W. Eaton wrote:
>> 
>>> | I did note a couple of things with rpmlint:
>>> |
>>> | octave-debuginfo.x86_64: W:
>>> | spurious-executable-perm 
>>> /usr/src/debug/octave-3.5.90/liboctave/singleton-cleanup.h
>>> | octave-debuginfo.x86_64: E:
>>> | incorrect-fsf-address /usr/src/debug/octave-3.5.90/src/gl2ps.h
>>> | octave-debuginfo.x86_64: W:
>>> | spurious-executable-perm 
>>> /usr/src/debug/octave-3.5.90/liboctave/oct-locbuf.h
>>> | octave-debuginfo.x86_64: E:
>>> | incorrect-fsf-address /usr/src/debug/octave-3.5.90/src/gl2ps.c
>>> 
>>> I fixed the file permissions.
>>> 
>>> We just import the gl2ps.c and gl2ps.h files from the gl2ps project,
>>> so I think the right place to fix that is in their sources.  Could
>>> someone please do that?  http://geuz.org/gl2ps/
>>> 
>>> Thanks,
>>> 
>>> jwe
>> 
>> Has this been reported to Christophe Geuzaine yet ?
>> 
>> If not, if someone can give a brief explanation to me (I'm not familiar with 
>> rpmlint or what is implied by the result above), I can file a bug report.
>> 
>> Ben
> 
> The FSF has a new address.  The license header in the files have the old 
> address.

Ok. I've filed a bug report.

        https://geuz.org/trac/gl2ps/ticket/7

Ben



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]