Re: patch to be applied to default or stable ?

[John W. Eaton]

On 17-Jan-2012, Ben Abbott wrote:

| 
| On Jan 15, 2012, at 10:12 PM, Ben Abbott wrote:
| 
| > On Jan 15, 2012, at 8:28 PM, "John W. Eaton" <address@hidden> wrote:
| > 
| >> On 15-Jan-2012, Ben Abbott wrote:
| >> 
| >> | I've fixed a bug where bit map output was being saved in the improper 
size.
| >> | 
| >> |    https://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/index.php?35307
| >> | 
| >> | Its not pushed yet, as I'm not sure which branch it should be applied to.
| >> | 
| >> | If you don't have a preference, I'll push it to default.
| >> 
| >> Did this feature work correctly in previous versions of Octave, or has
| >> this bug always been present?
| >> 
| >> jwe
| > 
| > This bug existed for the entire 3.4.x series. It was introduced when we 
began to use gs to convert eps to bitmap formats. The 3.2.x series would have 
worked correctly.
| > 
| > Ben
| 
| I pushed to default.
| 
|       http://hg.savannah.gnu.org/hgweb/octave/rev/df695e37d404

I'm sorry I didn't reply earlier.  I do want to be somewhat
conservative about what is applied to the stable branch but this
change doesn't look that risky and it fixes a regression so it might
be best to apply it to the stable branch.  I can transplant it if you
agree.

jwe