[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: saving function handles
|
From: |
Muhali |
|
Subject: |
Re: saving function handles |
|
Date: |
Thu, 15 Nov 2012 22:44:54 -0800 (PST) |
> This proposal might make sense, but I don't see how to implement it.
> Do you have precise suggestions how to do so? How can we know in
> advance if an absolute or a relative path should be used? Why and when
> should a relative path be preferred? What should the path be relative
> to?
Why not save the function code itself? Then you don't need any paths.
M.
--
View this message in context:
http://octave.1599824.n4.nabble.com/saving-function-handles-tp4646675p4646711.html
Sent from the Octave - Maintainers mailing list archive at Nabble.com.