Re: signbit and logical tests

[Michael D. Godfrey]

On 02/16/2013 01:30 AM, Daniel J Sebald wrote:
> Yes, I think it is that simple.  That is the one or two extra machine 
> cycles I suggested.  To illustrate, say the instruction you added is 
> in place:
>
> +    retval = retval != 0; }
If this is accepted then I can make a patch that also updates the doc to 
say
logical true of false instead of the current "non-zero or..."

Michael