octave-maintainers
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Test failures associated with FFTW


From: Daniel J Sebald
Subject: Test failures associated with FFTW
Date: Sat, 16 Mar 2013 02:33:15 -0500
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.24) Gecko/20111108 Fedora/3.1.16-1.fc14 Thunderbird/3.1.16

Rik (maybe),

I ran "make test" and had a failure for

processing 
/usr/local/src/octave/octave-dialog/build2/libinterp/dldfcn/fftw.cc-tst
  ***** testif HAVE_FFTW
 def_method = fftw ("planner");
 unwind_protect
   method = "estimate";
   fftw ("planner", method);
   assert (fftw ("planner"), method);
   method = "measure";
   fftw ("planner", method);
   assert (fftw ("planner"), method);
   method = "patient";
   fftw ("planner", method);
   assert (fftw ("planner"), method);
   method = "exhaustive";
   fftw ("planner", method);
   assert (fftw ("planner"), method);
   method = "hybrid";
   fftw ("planner", method);
   assert (fftw ("planner"), method);
 unwind_protect_cleanup
   fftw ("planner", def_method);
 end_unwind_protect
!!!!! test failed
value on right hand side of assignment is undefined

My conclusion is that this test is not being properly excluded. I run lines individually and immediately get:

octave:1> def_method = fftw ("planner");
warning: fftw: this copy of Octave was not configured to use the FFTW3 planner
error: value on right hand side of assignment is undefined

so perhaps somewhere in the "configure" process the HAVE_FFTW should be defined as null or logical 0???

Doing a search for "HAVE_FFTW" in addition to some other places I find:

config.log:AMCOND_HAVE_FFTW_FALSE=''
config.log:AMCOND_HAVE_FFTW_TRUE='#'
config.status:S["AMCOND_HAVE_FFTW_FALSE"]=""
config.status:S["AMCOND_HAVE_FFTW_TRUE"]="#"

Is something being overlooked there?

Dan


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]