octave-maintainers
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

llvm 3.1 vs. 3.2


From: Michael D. Godfrey
Subject: llvm 3.1 vs. 3.2
Date: Mon, 08 Apr 2013 11:06:35 -0400
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130402 Thunderbird/17.0.5

Max,

Are you still working on the JIT?  I ask because the
current version (3.2) of llvm has changes that are
incompatible with the current Octave implementation.

Most systems are still on llvm 3.1, but Fedora 18 now
requires 3.2.  (This is due to the version of mesa that
they currently provide.)

It appears that, at least for some time, it will be necessary
to have a config option to support either 3.1 or 3.2.

Any suggestions about how to get this done?

Michael



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]