[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: llvm 3.1 vs. 3.2
|
From: |
Michael D. Godfrey |
|
Subject: |
Re: llvm 3.1 vs. 3.2 |
|
Date: |
Wed, 10 Apr 2013 19:15:33 -0400 |
|
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130402 Thunderbird/17.0.5 |
On 04/10/2013 07:00 PM, Max Brister wrote:
Yes, hopefully I will have some time to work on Octave after the
semester is over. I probably will not have time to implement new
features though, and will focus on bug fixes/code cleanup.
Sounds good to me, particularly if this means getting the 3.2 updates
in. By
the time that the JIT code goes into an octave release llvm 3.2 will be
in pretty
wide use, I would guess. 3.2 is the only version of llvm that is
compatible with
Fedora 18 now. So, I have had to compile without JIT. The last version
that
I could use seemed to be working entirely correctly. This included
quite a lot
of complex-valued stuff.
Thanks for your contribution and good luck with your studies!
Michael