octave-maintainers
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Re: merge classdef to default?


From: Jordi Gutiérrez Hermoso
Subject: Re: Re: merge classdef to default?
Date: Tue, 30 Jul 2013 13:31:16 -0400

On 30 July 2013 12:48, Michael Goffioul <address@hidden> wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 30, 2013 at 12:16 PM, Jordi Gutiérrez Hermoso
> <address@hidden> wrote:
>>
>> On 30 July 2013 11:58, Michael Goffioul <address@hidden>
>> wrote:
>> > There are structural changes in load-path and symbol-table components to
>> > support package (like changes in method signatures). Those cannot be
>> > (easily) disabled with a runtime flag.
>>
>> So how about a buiild-time flag instead?
>
>
> Tbh, this would unnecessarily clutter the code, as it would be temporary
> anyway.

Yeah, I thought so.

If it's actually usable at all and some sort of nontrivial classdef
already works (i.e. some classdef-based package that people are
already using), then my vote is for leaving it in but warning loudly
when anyone tries to use it.

- Jordi G. H.


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]