[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Re: merge classdef to default?
From: |
Jordi Gutiérrez Hermoso |
Subject: |
Re: Re: merge classdef to default? |
Date: |
Tue, 30 Jul 2013 13:31:16 -0400 |
On 30 July 2013 12:48, Michael Goffioul <address@hidden> wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 30, 2013 at 12:16 PM, Jordi Gutiérrez Hermoso
> <address@hidden> wrote:
>>
>> On 30 July 2013 11:58, Michael Goffioul <address@hidden>
>> wrote:
>> > There are structural changes in load-path and symbol-table components to
>> > support package (like changes in method signatures). Those cannot be
>> > (easily) disabled with a runtime flag.
>>
>> So how about a buiild-time flag instead?
>
>
> Tbh, this would unnecessarily clutter the code, as it would be temporary
> anyway.
Yeah, I thought so.
If it's actually usable at all and some sort of nontrivial classdef
already works (i.e. some classdef-based package that people are
already using), then my vote is for leaving it in but warning loudly
when anyone tries to use it.
- Jordi G. H.
- initial release of matlab compatible netcdf interface for octave, Alexander Barth, 2013/07/30
- Re: initial release of matlab compatible netcdf interface for octave, Michael Goffioul, 2013/07/30
- Re: initial release of matlab compatible netcdf interface for octave, Alexander Barth, 2013/07/30
- merge classdef to default?, John W. Eaton, 2013/07/30
- Re: merge classdef to default?, Michael Goffioul, 2013/07/30
- Re: merge classdef to default?, John W. Eaton, 2013/07/30
- Aw: Re: merge classdef to default?, Stefan Mahr, 2013/07/30
- Re: Re: merge classdef to default?, Michael Goffioul, 2013/07/30
- Re: Re: merge classdef to default?, Jordi Gutiérrez Hermoso, 2013/07/30
- Re: Re: merge classdef to default?, Michael Goffioul, 2013/07/30
- Re: Re: merge classdef to default?,
Jordi Gutiérrez Hermoso <=