|
From: | Giorgos Bontzios |
Subject: | Re: inv() optimization flags |
Date: | Wed, 9 Oct 2013 15:32:26 +0300 |
On Tue, 2013-10-08 at 18:47 +0300, Giorgos Bontzios wrote:It does. Have you already read this FAQ?
> I've noticed that the inv() function of Octave is quite faster than
> Seldon's which is weird since, to the best of my knowledge, Octave
> calls also the same LAPACK functions for inversion.
http://wiki.octave.org/FAQ#How_does_Octave_solve_linear_systems.3F
The exact method depends on the type of matrix that you input. If you
need more details, I would recommend stepping through the C++ source
with a debugger so you can see which LAPACK method Octave is calling.
- Jordi G. H.
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |