octave-maintainers
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: make check (new?) failure


From: Ben Abbott
Subject: Re: make check (new?) failure
Date: Thu, 17 Oct 2013 15:43:15 -0400

On Oct 17, 2013, at 3:38 PM, Dmitri A. Sergatskov wrote:

> hg head
> changeset:   17676:c060ad097056
> bookmark:    @
> tag:         tip
> user:        Torsten <address@hidden>
> date:        Thu Oct 17 20:29:17 2013 +0200
> summary:     add menu entries to the editor for directly accessing the 
> editor's settings
> 
> changeset:   17657:df266c923b83
> branch:      classdef
> user:        John W. Eaton <address@hidden>
> date:        Mon Oct 14 16:52:46 2013 -0400
> summary:     delete unnecessary tok_type semantic value in parser
> 
> changeset:   17112:eff3d78367f0
> branch:      stable
> parent:      17108:2c76db746701
> user:        Jordi GutiƩrrez Hermoso <address@hidden>
> date:        Tue Jul 30 13:20:58 2013 -0400
> summary:     * Makefile.am (doxyhtml): Restore doxyhtml argument in recursive 
> make call
> 
> 
> =================
> 
>  test orient
>   ***** test
>  orient landscape;
>  assert (orient,"landscape")   # change to landscape
>  assert (get (hfig, "papersize"), papersize([2, 1]));
>  assert (get (hfig, "paperposition"), paperposition([2, 1, 4, 3]));
> !!!!! test failed
> ASSERT errors for:  assert (get (hfig, "paperposition"),paperposition ([2, 1, 
> 4, 3]))
> 
>   Location  |  Observed  |  Expected  |  Reason
>     (1)          0.25         2.5        Abs err 2.25 exceeds tol 0
>     (3)          10.5          6         Abs err 4.5 exceeds tol 0
> shared variables 
>   scalar structure containing the fields:
> 
>     papersize =
> 
>         8.50000   11.00000
> 
>     paperposition =
> 
>        0.25000   2.50000   8.00000   6.00000
> 
>     tallpaperposition =
> 
>         0.25000    0.25000    8.00000   10.50000
> 
>     hfig =  1
> 
> ========================
> 
> That was fine just a couple days ago...
> 
> Dmitri.

Rik just pushed a changeset that may be responsible.

Ben



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]