[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: MXE-Octave & release candidates
From: |
PhilipNienhuis |
Subject: |
RE: MXE-Octave & release candidates |
Date: |
Tue, 5 Nov 2013 12:31:35 -0800 (PST) |
-----Original Message-----
From: Philip Nienhuis [mailto:address@hidden
> John Donoghue wrote:
>>
>>> Message: 8
>>> Date: Sun, 3 Nov 2013 13:19:44 -0800 (PST)
>>> From: PhilipNienhuis<
> pr.nienhuis@
> >
>
> Did you push the changes?
>
> If so I'll pull and give it a try tonight.
>
> Usually with updates of dependencies I have to carefully clean up the
> MXE-tree - starting over from scratch is a very time-consuming affair.
> Especially for small packages this gets out of balance - like 4 hrs
> building
> of a complete mxe-octave where the updated package in question builds
> within
> a minute.
> Luckily llvm didn't get compiled at all here yet, so that will be no
> problem. With gnuplot it may be different.
>
> Philip
> ---
>
> I pushed yesterday.
>
> Gnuplot is a standalone application so should be quick to build it.
(cross-building right now)
Not only gnuplot: I see build-m4, build-autoconf, build-automake, lapack,
arpack, gettext, gnutils, libidn, curl, gl2ps, gnuplot.... (llvm yet to
come) - I'm sure I pulled & updated maybe three days ago or so.
Perusing the log I see that you pushed a cset so that gl2ps.dll gets
properly included in natively mxe-octave built installers.
Just to let you know that with my cross-builds gl2ps.dll didn't get included
either. I think I reported that a few day ago.
Philip
--
View this message in context:
http://octave.1599824.n4.nabble.com/Re-MXE-Octave-release-candidates-tp4658781p4658865.html
Sent from the Octave - Maintainers mailing list archive at Nabble.com.