[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: --no-gui vs. --no-gui-libs
From: |
Rik |
Subject: |
Re: --no-gui vs. --no-gui-libs |
Date: |
Tue, 12 Nov 2013 07:59:46 -0800 |
On 11/12/2013 07:44 AM, address@hidden wrote:
> Message: 4
> Date: Tue, 12 Nov 2013 09:29:58 +0100
> From: "c." <address@hidden>
> To: marco atzeri <address@hidden>
> Cc: "address@hidden Maintainers"
> <address@hidden>
> Subject: Re: FLTK on MacOS X
> Message-ID: <address@hidden>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
>
>
> On 12 Nov 2013, at 07:53, marco atzeri <address@hidden> wrote:
>
>>> >> BTW, how do I run octave-cli without installing?
>> >
>> > ./run-octave --no-gui
> Marco,
>
> I also thoght so, but that is not how it actally works.
>
> ./run-octave --no-gui
>
> runs
>
> src/.libs/octave-gui --no-gui
>
> I was asking how to run octave-cli instead, which is a completely different
> binary.
>
> c.
You are looking for
./run-octave --no-gui-libs
which runs the binary that has not even been linked against Qt libraries.
--Rik
[Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread] |
- Re: --no-gui vs. --no-gui-libs,
Rik <=