Re: documenting how DEFUN interpreter functions can be called in C++

[John W. Eaton]

On 11/17/2013 06:38 PM, c. wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Would it make sense to document in the manual how DEFUN
> interpreter functions can be called in t C++?
> Would this changeset be OK for that purpose?

It might also be good to note that the list of built-in functions can 
change.  We make no guarantees that a function that is currently built 
in won't be implemented as a .m file or as a dynamically linked function 
in the future.

jwe