Re: undefined compound chaining behavior

[Richard Crozier]

On 13/06/2014 09:20, Hossein Sajjadi wrote:
> > No, I'm afraid Jordi's right, you are wrong. I think we'll all have to
> > just agree to disagree with you on this one.
> >
> > Richard
> Please see the slide, and feel free to bring a reasonable argument,If
> so I will adhere yours.


Arguments are essentially thus:

1. Octave does not necessarily follow exactly the operators of C++

2. The Octave devs have decided on the current behaviour of Octave 
language which is determined by the design of the Octave interpreter, 
and is independent of the C++ compiler

QED



--
The University of Edinburgh is a charitable body, registered in
Scotland, with registration number SC005336.